Beta Pleated Chic
  • Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Podcast
  • Work with us

Rotations: Sorority Rush for Academics?

7/20/2015

0 Comments

 
The Grad Gal Sal column is back! Follow Sally through her adventures as a PhD student at UC Berkeley. Check in monthly to hear what she's most excited, worried, and curious about! And, check out Sally's earlier articles (tagged: Grad Gal Sal) about letters of recommendation (parts one & two), the GREs, your CV, interviews, and picking the right graduate school for you.
Picture
Picture
Picture
Follow Sally's instagram, @sallywinklr, for more awesome lab-grams or check out the BPC homepage for a collection of #todayinlab images.

by Sally Winkler
​

One of the unexpected joys of 
my PhD program was the rotations. Before choosing a thesis lab, I did 3 8-week rotations with three different groups, with no pressure to join or commit to a lab before all 3 were complete. While I am glad to be in a lab for real and making real (albeit glacial) progress towards graduation, there are some things I will miss about being a rotation student – and some things I won’t.

During my rotations, I was lucky to have rotated with three great labs, and I would have been happy as a thesis student in any of these labs. But rotations have some major underlying stressors. For the most part, a lab’s expectations of a rotation student are pretty limited. You’re only there for 8 weeks, and (especially in Bioengineering and other fairly broad disciplines) you’ll probably be learning several new techniques that you’ll need to be trained in before you can be independent. That being said, if you don’t do something to stand out and impress the lab, they won’t be super excited about you joining.

During my rotations, I of course tried to get into labs’ good graces, and but it was hard to know what to do. Working hard and befriending labmates are obviously necessary, but I found that navigating my relationship with the PI, figuring out how much time I should be spending in lab, balancing lab work and class work, and sleuthing out the lab’s inner secrets (money, dynamics, goals, vibes, etc.) were tricky, especially at first.

Nonetheless, I found the rotation process of we-are-having-fun-and-doing-science-but-secretly-I-am-making-judgements-about-your-group-while-you-all-are-making-judgements-about-me to be eerily familiar. It reminded me of my days in undergrad during sorority rush. While rush is not identical at every school, the basic premise is that over the course of 3-7 evenings, you meet with all the sorority chapters at your campus back-to-back for hour-long “parties” that consist of standing around and talking. To further explore into the similarities between rotations and sorority rush, I have highlighted several key points in the following table.
Picture

​*Now I’m trying to come up with a TSwift parody about my thesis lab. “I’ve got a blank [TLC] plate baby – where’s my product?” Not quite…

**Definitely broke something really expensive during one of my rotations. It was a software bug waiting to bite anyone, but it bit me and it was so stressful.

In conclusion, I would say that sorority rush gets a B- and rotations get an A. Still, they are definitely both grades that you get in intro weeder classes: interesting and fun but more stressful than they should be, and mostly you’re just excited to pass and move on to the next step. Which, for me, is a PhD! And if a B- rush experience led to an A+ sorority experience, will an A rotation experience mean an A+++++ thesis experience? Probably not, but I’m excited to see what’s next!
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    May 2017
    March 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014

    Categories

    All
    Academia
    Advice
    Advisor
    Anastasia Voevodin
    Anatomy
    Applications
    Art
    Ask A PI
    Audio
    Bioengineering
    Blogs
    Books
    Business
    Cancer
    Celebrity
    Coding
    Collaboration
    Community
    Companies
    Company
    Conferences
    Contributors
    CV
    Dance
    Decision
    Diversity
    Education
    Engineering
    Entertainment
    Environment
    Experience
    Family
    Father
    FDA
    Fertility
    Fitness
    Founder
    Fun
    Funding
    Games
    Genomics
    Gifts
    Grad Gal Sal
    Graduate School
    Grants
    Guest
    Guest Post
    Hardware
    Health
    Heidi Norton
    Historical
    Holiday
    Hot Topic
    Inspiration
    Interview
    Interviews
    Jena Barnes
    Katherine Stafford
    Lab
    Leadership
    Math
    MD
    Medical School
    Medicine
    Megan Sperry
    Movies
    Networking
    News
    NIH
    Non-profit
    NSF
    Nursing
    Office
    Organization
    Organizations
    Outreach
    Parents
    Pharma
    PhD
    Phuong Nguyen
    Podcast
    Podcasts
    Policy
    Politics
    Productivity
    Professor
    Q&A
    Qualifying Exam
    Reading
    Recommendations
    Research
    Review
    Rotations
    Sally Winkler
    Science
    Scientific Waste
    Shopping
    Social Media
    Sponsored
    Sports
    Start-up
    Statistics
    Summer
    Teaching
    Technology
    Toys
    Translational Research
    Travel
    TV
    Under The Microscope
    University Of Pennsylvania
    Video
    Volunteering
    Writing

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Podcast
  • Work with us